Teens at High Risk of Suicide Essay Example for Free

Teens at High Risk of Suicide Essay Teen suicide is a major problem in today’s society and it is totally preventable. This issue needs to be taken care of immediately. Teen should not be taking their lives intentionally. Teen suicide is derived from three major factors: bullying, drug/alcohol abuse, and most commonly mental illness. It has been a pretty popular topic in the media world but it still just gets pushed under the rug. Suicide is currently the third leading cause of death in the United States between the ages of 15 and 24 (Holmes 1). It is also one of the most preventable forms of death because the person will show warning signs. This is a common myth; that people do not show any warning signs. That in fact is wrong, someone who is thinking about committing suicide almost always shows warning signs it is whether or not you pay attention and take action towards them. Although there are many factors that can lead people to cause suicide mental illness is the leading cause. Bulling, depression, anxiety, drug and alcohol abuse, and sexual or physical abuse follow close behind (Teen Suicide Statistics 2). Bullying is quickly starting to become one of the major leading causes of teen suicide. There are plenty of news stories on how yet another teen has taken their life due to being bullied. Bullying has been a serious problem in schools for many years now and somehow it needs to be put to an end. School should be a safe place where you go to get an education. You should not have to worry about if your going to get picked on today before school, during lunch, or after school and so your day is just spent in fear. In the past year bullying in schools has been brought to the public attention more but nothing is really successfully being done about it. Most bulling occurs in the elementary and high school years. Everyone knows that kids and teenagers can be curl towards each other at times. A common reason that kids or teens feel the need to bully someone is peer pressure. Almost everyone has experienced some type of bullying in their lifetime, whether they were the victim, the one doing the bullying, or even just being a bystander. ABC news has reported that almost 30 percen t of students are bullies or bullying victims. It is not uncommon to hear of those that were often bullied became bullies themselves in return. It is not always just the nerdy kid with glasses that gets bullied on the playground by the jock it can be anyone. Once it gets to the point where the kid doesn’t even want to come to school  anymore and they aren’t acting like themselves it is time to really be concerned. According to a study completed by Yale University it states; â€Å"victims of bullying are two to nine times more likely to contemplate suicide than people who aren’t bullied† (ABC 1). We all have heard of teenagers that were bullied and as a result they took action in an extravagant way. An example of this is the columbine shooting that happened on April 20th, 1999 in Colorado. Dylan Kelbord and Eric Harris had known each other since middle school and one day they were so fed up with their peers and they took violent action. On April 20th, 1999 the boys’ seek to get revenge on those that had ever made fun of them. During the middle of the school day the boys walked into the sch ool with guns, knives, and bombs and walked down the hallways to kill. By the time that it was over twelve students, one teacher, and the two boys were dead, and 21 more were injured. (Rosenberg 1) All of this could have been prevented. Both Kelbord and Harris showed suicidal signs. Stated in the video left behind by them Kelbord states that he had been contemplating suicide since 1997 and the boys started thinking of a large massacre in 1998. They even wrote about this plan in each other’s yearbooks. Also stated in the Columbine Massacre by Jennifer Rosenburg is that â€Å"looking back, there were telltale hints and clues that something was seriously wrong. Video tapes, journals, guns and bombs in their rooms would have been easily found if the parents had looked† (Rosenburg 4). So, all of this could have been prevented if people had paid more attention to their personalities. After this incident it started to become more common to hear about teen suicide in the media related to being bullied. It got so bad that celebrities such as Elen Degeneres, Elton John, Anne Hathaway, and many more began posting video messages to reach out in an attempt to stop bullying. There are so many bullying prevention programs out there that not only help those cope with being bullied, but they also try and help the ones that are doing the bullying. These programs help them direct their anger in a non-harmful ways. Some of these programs are B.R.A.V.A. (Bully Resistance and Violence Avoidance Program), T.E.A.C.H. (Teens Educating and Confronting Homophiba) and the RISE (Rise in Schools Everywhere) (Registry of Bullying Prevention Programs 1 2). These programs are all created to focus on putting  an end to bullying. Theses programs are great because bullying affects those of all ages. Everyone is guilty of it and everyone knows how it feels to be put down. So together we need to stand up against bullying in every school and if this were to happen the number of teen suicides related to being bullied could be reduced greatly. Even just paying attention to warning signs can help those in need get help. â€Å"According to the Canadian Metal Health Association some warning signs include but are not limited to; repeated expressions of hopelessness, helplessness or depression, behavior that is out of character, signs of depression – sleeplessness, social withdraw, loss of appà ©tit, giving away prized possessions, telling final wishes, remarks related to death and dying, or an expressed intent to commit suicide† (Preventing Suicide 1). All of these signs should be taken seriously in order to prevent the worse. However bullying is of course not the only factor that leads many teens to suicide. Drug and/or alcohol abuse is also a contributing factor that may lead a teen to suicide. It could be that they have an addiction to drugs or alcohol and has led them to commit suicide or that they had tried using these substances to cope with their feelings and they ended up having an overdose or poising. No matter what the scenario is there is still help for substance abuse so it does not have to lead to accidental or intentionally overdoses or suicide due to withdrawal. There are all kinds of support groups, therapy or even having a friend sit them down and talk to them about their concerns they have been noticing can help lesson the numbers of death from these substances. Talking with the person directly about the situation can be very beneficial. It could be that all the person needs is someone to listen to what they are going through and what feelings they are having without being judged or looked down upon. Giving them your support can help them work through it and make them feel like life is tough but it is worth living. There is also the myth that talking to a person about their suicidal thoughts will push them over the edge and cause them to actually follow through with it. In reality talking to someone about suicide will most often times do more good than harm; in fact the worst thing you can do is not take any action at all (Teen Suicide is Preventable 1). Helpguide.org states in their article, â€Å" Suicide Prevention: Spotting the Signs and Helping and  Suicidal Person,† that Talking to a friend or family member about their suicidal thoughts and feelings can be difficult but, if you even think they might be thinking about it its better to ask. You cannot make a person suicidal by showing that you care. In fact, giving a suicidal person the opportunity to express their feelings can provide relief from loneliness and may prevent a suicidal attempt. If a friend or family m ember is suicidal, the best way to help is by offering an empathetic listening ear. (Suicide Prevention 2) Just letting your loved one know that he or she is not alone and that you care can make a world of difference. However, don’t put the responsibility of making them well on you. Still offer them recovery options. Drug and alcohol abuse is often times common for depressed people and is a hard habit to break that is not easy to do alone. Depression is a leading cause of suicide and falls under the category of mental illness. All mental illness can be anything from depression to bipolar disorder. Although depression is the leading cause of suicide it does not mean that everyone who commits suicide was depressed. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are other common mental illnesses that have been proven to be causes of suicide according the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI 1). Sexual orientation, which can also fall into the cat orgy of mental illness, also plays a major role in suicides among teens and young adults. According to the Centre for Suicide Prevention, gay, lesbian and bisexual teens have a higher chance of committing suicide than other teens. â€Å"According to a study completed in 2001, 48% of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth have said that their contemplation of suicide was related to, or was a result of their sexual preference† (Suicide among Gay†¦ 1). Out of all causes of suicides, mental illness had proven to be the leading basis; in fact only about 10% of people who have committed suicide were not suffering from a mental illness of some sort. With the majority of people that have committed suicide suffering from a mental disorder or substance abuse, they often times â€Å"have difficulty coping with such crippling stressors. They are unable to recognize that suicide is a permant solution to a temporary problem according to the National Institute of Mental Health† (NAMI 3). There are many factors that play a role in teenage suicide. Being a teenager is not an easy thing. You are going through all kinds of body, thought and feeling changes during your teen years. School is not easy and people are not always nice. That is just how life goes. Teens need to know that everyone faces these problems and there are many other ways to cope with any situation before it has to lead to suicide. Anti- depressant drugs have proven to be highly effective in helping teens steer away from the thought of suicide. People need to stand up against bullying and take into general consideration that every action will have a reaction on a person, whether it is good or bad. Suicide is preventable and if people were more considerate of others feelings, then the number of teen deaths could easily be reduced. When someone gives up hope on living there needs to be more hands reaching out to them and showing them why they are here today.

Comparing Types Of Visitor Attractions

Comparing Types Of Visitor Attractions Millions of guest visit tourist attraction each year. The majorities of them enjoy the experience and tell their friends about the attraction. The extent of attraction development is increasing throughout the world. The nature and type of attraction now available may be a large theme park, with several white- knuckle thrill rides, a historic property, a museum, a heritage center, a cave system, a zoo, a brewery or distillery, a cathedral, or even a nuclear power station. Tourist attractions are an essential ingredient for successful tourism, destination development. Attractions are designed to attract; they are prime motivators for visiting a destination or resort (Clare Gunn, 1972). Attractions are clearly at the forefront of tourism, both culturally and economically. Unfortunately, a succinct, rigorous definition relevant to all visitor attractions does not exist. Attractions can, however, be identified and categorized by applying the following criteria. A visitor attraction is a feature in an area that is a place, venue, or focus of activity and does the following: Sets out to attract visitors (day visitors from resident and tourist population) and is managed accordingly. Provides a fun and pleasurable experience and an enjoyable way for customers to spend their leisure time. Desislava Savkova Petrova- Visitor Attraction Management TAL014- 2 Is developed to realize this potential Is managed as an attraction providing satisfaction to its customers. Provide an appropriate level of facilities and services to meet and cater to the demands, needs, and interest of its visitors. Today we have many of escaping, but tourist attraction still growing in number and admissions are increasing. The reasons are not mystical. In fact, the fundamental reason remains the same enjoyment. Increasingly, enjoyment is now qualified by other deeper sociological and psychological motivations such as enhancing life and experiencing things first-hand. Todays attraction markets are more sophisticated in their tastes than the predecessors. The new generation of hands-on museums and exploration centers involve the customer in complex experience that is both enjoyable and interpretive. Attractions, now more than ever, have to animate, or bring to life, their message, be it fun or educational, be it heritage or thrill-creating. Although the nature of all attractions is similar, their particular individual quality is different. Each offers a unique experience to its customers. The operation and management of attractions do, however, share a number of similarities and common features. Each attraction has to operate effectively and efficiently and achieve a high degree of visitor satisfaction within the resources available to it. Comparing and contrast two different distinct types of visitor attraction- The word castle may be seen on English maps against all manner of different sites and buildings, some fortified, some purely residential, from long abandoned prehistoric camps to pseudo- Gothic shams. A castle was a private fortress, of king or noble, and was a product of the feudal system. The castle, then, is the fortified residence of a lord and a manifestation of feudal society and more especially feudal lordship. Leeds Castle is perhaps the loveliest, most romantic castle in England. This fairy- tail structure is situated on two islands in the middle of the River Len near Maidstone, Kent , not far from London. The history of Leeds Castle England can be traced to the 9th century, when a Saxon lord built a manor on the one of the islands on the River Len. The most famous resident in the history of Leeds Castle was King Henry VIII, who made further additions to the Desislava Savkova Petrova- Visitor Attraction Management TAL014- 2 structure, converting it from a fortress to a royal palace for his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. Leeds Castle England has been open to the public since 1976 and is maintained by the Leeds Castle Foundation. A Leeds Castle tour includes visits to the old keep, the Gloriette, named after Eleanor of Castle. Dog lovers will enjoy the unique dog collar museum, also part of the Leeds Castle Tour. Outside, the Leeds Castle tour features the Culpepper Gardens, a classic English country garden; several aviaries of native and exotic birds, including a duckery with rare black swans; woodland gardens; a grotto; and a yew-tree maze. The extensive parkland surrounding the castle was landscaped in the early 18th century. Many of the trees that were planted then still remain. The park is split by streams and lakes that are home to over 30 species of waterfowl. The Duckery provides habitat for ducks, geese, and swans. There is a lovely woodland garden, at its best in spring when daffodils, narcissi, and anemones are in bloom, and an English Cottage Garden. Leeds Castle is also home to the Nation al Collection of Bergamot. In the gardens is an aviary housing rare and endangered bird species from across the globe. More exotic still is the yew Maze, planted and trimmed to resemble a topiary castle. Within the Maze is a secret underground grotto. There is even a 9-hole public golf course. Leeds Castle provides a venue for many country events in Kent. The castle can be booked for conferences, weddings, and other private gatherings. Heligan is a modern miracle. Until the First World War, the estate gardens at Heligan were one of the glories of Cornwall. But they were left to sleep for many years. The Lost Gardens of Heligan, Cornwall were created mainly in the 19th century, of were one of the finest gardens in England of their period, with 57 acres of planted gardens, around 100 acres of ornamental woodlands, and 300 acres of rides. Scattered throughout were follies and temples. Henry Hawkins, Tremayne and John Claude Tremayne in turn created and planted the gardens and ornamental woodlands with walks and rides. They were noted botanists and horticulturist and by the 1900 had a amassed a wonderful collection of trees and shrubs from all over the globe, many of which can be seen today. It was the centre of the community with 20 house staff and up to 22 garden staff, with the local economy dependent on the estate for their income and Desislava Savkova Petrova- Visitor Attraction Management TAL014- 2 parishes assisted by the Tremaynes benevolence. Created as a horticultural playground for experimenting with the new passion for subtropical plants that swept the country one hundred and fifty years ago, this twenty two acre steep-sided valley garden is home to some of the lushest vegetation in the country. The Pleasure grounds- The pleasure grounds house rare and exotic shrubs, collected by plant hunters, from all over the world in the 19th century. There are lots of parts to the Northern Summerhouse with its sea views, the Italian Garden, the Fern Ravine, the Wishing Well, one of the finest beehole walls in the country and the Crystal grotto whose interior was lit by candles for romantic summer evenings. Recently opened in 1997 is the walled sundial garden. And there is the cast herbaceous border described as the finest in England in Victoria times. The Vegetable, flower and fruit gardens- In previous centuries the Productive Gardens were called upon to supply the Big House with all of its day-to-day requirements of fruits, vegetables, herbs, ornamental plants and cut flowers. Four walled gardens complete with glasshouses, frames and pits, produced the flowers, fruit and vegetables for the Big House. The melon garden even gas a manure heated pineapple pit, the glasshouses produce citrus fruit, grapes and peaches. Here is also a wonderful collection of working buildings, a potting shed, a fruit store, tool sheds and a dark store. The Jungle- the Big House looks down the valley which eventually winds its way to the fishing village of Mevagissy. The jungle was created to house a collection of sub tropical plants. The Lost Valley- The latest in the string of restorations. The area has a history of charcoal burning and Georgian rides, with a water meadow and restored lakes. It was opened to visitors in 1998 to visit this native Cornish woodland- a circular walk of an extra mile now incorporates the Medieval Sunken Lane and additional sections of the original Georgian Ride. The lakes and ponds are home to several species of fish and skimming the surface of the water, magnificent dragonflies and damselflies hunt their prey on the wing. For all those with a spirit of adventure this is a unique opportunity to roam through a wild and beautiful landscape. Desislava Savkova Petrova- Visitor Attraction Management TAL014- 2 Since it opened, visitors have flocked to Heligan. By 1998 it became the most visited private garden in Britain with over 200, 000 visitors. It also won the Country Life Garden of the Year award 1995. Compare: The Leeds Castle and The Lost Gardens are opened for the public. They both have gardens. In the Leeds Castle there is a lovely woodland garden, at its best in spring when daffodils, narcissi, and anemones are in bloom, and an English Cottage Garden. In the gardens is an aviary housing rare and endangered bird species from across the globe. The Lost Gardens of Heligan, Cornwall are created in 19th century, of were one of the finest gardens in England of their period. There are few different kind of gardens- The Northern Gardens, The Vegetable, flowers and fruit gardens, The Jungle. In the both places there are located lakes. Leeds Castle has to be one of the most beautifully situated medieval castles in England, projecting into its natural lake. In the Leeds Castle, the park is split by stream and lakes that are home to over 30 species of waterfowl. In the Lost Gardens of Heligan, there is a place called The Last Valley. With its history of charcoal burning and Georgian rides , its water meadows and restored lakes and ponds. The Leeds Castle and The Lost Gardens of Heligan are open every day of the year. This two visitor attractions have their own web-sites where you can find out what information you need. Contrast: The first visitor attraction is a castle and the second is a garden. This makes them different from each other. Leeds Castle provides a venue for many country events in Kent. The castle can be booked for conferences, banquets, weddings, and other private gatherings. Leeds Castle is not just a museum but also a place where people meet and special events bring the grounds to life. On the first Saturday of every month, the castle hosts Kentish Evenings, featuring a cocktail reception, a private Leeds Castle tour, and five- course meal. In June and July, Leeds Castle hosts large open- air concerts, featuring music and performances. The Lost Gardens of Heligan doesnt offer Desislava Savkova Petrova- Visitor Attraction Management TAL014- 2 such an option, people just go for a day- trip. But in the web-site they offer a hotel, where you can stay when visiting Cornwall. Attraction is a good word; it releases managers and visitors from the limitations of the more popular but restrictive titles such as parks and resorts. It is also important to consider some of the less obvious reasons that people visit attractions, because these play an important part in the way customers are treated and how managers understand customer aspirations, their disappointments, and complaints. Customer perceptions can vary widely from the image that is promoted. In the days before television, video, cable, or satellite communications and with little other mass entertainment for the growing populations of the main industrial countries, these fun attractions soon developed strong market interest. People worked longer hours in more difficult circumstances. Wars were never far away, together with considerable repression of either ethnic, religious, or cultural groups. People needed some magic in their lives to escape the rather difficult realities of everyday life. Today we have many ways of escaping, but tourist attractions still growing in number and admissions are increasing. In reasons are not mystical. In fact, the fundamental reason remains the same- enjoyment.

Socrates Last Error Essay -- Philosophy Papers

Socrates' Last Error In the dialogue, Crito, Socrates justified his decision to accept his death penalty. His decision was praised as principled and just. However, such a view was one of the greatest myths in the history of philosophy. Contrary to the accepted ideas, I wish to show that Socrates’ argument was erroneous, the crucial error being his failure to distinguish between substantial and procedural justice. In fact, the whole of the Crito refers to some deeper problems of the philosophy of law and morality. The dialogue "Crito" recounts Socrates' last days, immediately before his execution. As the text reveals, his friend Crito proposes to Socrates that he escape from prison. In a dialogue with Crito, Socrates considers the proposal, trying to establish whether an act like that would be just and morally justified. Eventually, he came to argue that by rejecting his sentence and by trying to escape from prison he would commit unjust and morally unjustified acts. Therefore, he decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Because of his decision, he became one of the cult figures in the history of philosophy, a man of intact moral integrity who had made his final decision according to the very same principles that guided his entire life. He was praised as a grand rationalist who had acted rationally and justly—a view which, I believe, represents one of the greatest myths in the history of philosophy. Contrary to this widely accepted myth, I will try to demonstrate that Socrates' argument was erroneous, which made his decision less rational. In fact, had he decided to escape, his behavior would not have represented an unjust act. Although his argumentation and dialogue with Crito seem more like a moral sermon, his ... ... of Law and State, p. 113. (2) Hart, The Concept of Law, p. 203. (3) Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I-II, question 95. (4) Plato, Crito, in: The Works of Plato, The Nottingham Society, New York, vol. III, p. 125-6. (the year of publication unknown). (5) Ibid. p. 126. (6) Ibid. p. 126. (7) H. L., Hart, The Concept of Law, ch. VIII, and D., Lyons, Ethics and the rule of law, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 78 ff, (8) D., Lyons, Ethics and the Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 81. (9) Plato, The Apology, in: The Works of Plato, The Nottingham Society, New York, vol. III, p. 91. (the year of publication unknown). (10) Plato, Crito, in: The Works of Plato, The Nottingham Society, New York, vol. III, p. 129. (the year of publication unknown). (11) Ibid., 124. (12) Ibid., 124. (13) St. Augustine, Confessions, IV.

Assess some of the ways in which Third World Debt might be reduced. Ess

Assess some of the ways in which Third World Debt might be reduced. Despite the overwhelming number of statistics and indicators, global poverty is as hard to measure as it is to conceptualize. One fact is undeniable: someone is going to have to pay for past debts. It could be the people in debtor countries, or the banks, or the people in advanced industrial countries. Most likely it will be some combination of these three groups. In the last ten years, there have been a variety of proposals which, unfortunately, usually reflect only the special interests of the groups proposing them. Generally speaking, these solutions fall into three categories: repudiation, minor adjustments in repayments, or reduction. A report â€Å"Relief Works: African proposals for debt cancellation - and why debt relief works† examines public spending in 10 African countries which have benefited from debt cancellation. It reveals that total spending on education in these countries has increased, and is now twice the amount that is being paid to foreign creditors. The story is similar with spending on health, which has risen by 70 per cent since before debt relief, and is now one third higher than spending on debt repayments. And contrary to the views of sceptics, debt relief is not being used to fuel military expenditure. The report presents these clear indications of the positive difference that debt cancellation can make as the strongest argument there is in favour of further debt relief for the world's poorest countries. However, various G8 Summits have seen promises of billions in debt-write off, but almost hardly are carried out, or contain a lot of spin. For example, a lot of debt relief promised may include moneys previously annouced for such purposes, thus creating an impression of enormous write-offs. Bilateral debt relief also does not typically release actual money to be used for other purposes. Multilateral debt relief, however, could. Debt repudiation, in the sense of a unilateral cessation of repayment, occurred in a number of countries: Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, and Peru. With the exception of the Peruvian cessation, however, most of these actions have been taken with assurances that the stoppages were only temporary. Peru announced that it was unilaterally limiting its ... ... and abysmal poverty as a normal condition. This need not, and should not, be the case. The developed countries have a responsibility to create conditions whereby the poorer countries can interact more productively in international economic activities: their single most important contribution to this end might be in the area of reducing trade restrictions on the products of poorer countries. Similarly, the developing countries have a responsibility to see that money is more effectively utilized within their own borders. The obscene personal profits accumulated by such leaders as Marcos of the Philippines and Mobutu of Zaire should not be fostered by the strategic interests of other countries. The banks should also face up to the fact that their single-minded pursuit of profits almost led them to the brink of bankruptcy. The lesson to be learned from this experience is that for economic growth to be sustained, close attention must be paid to the mutual interests of all parties involved. Only after sustained economic growth returns to the heavily indebted countries can the international community even begin to determine manageable rates and methods of debt repayment.

Lady Macbeth :: Literary Analysis, Shakespeare

The play Macbeth was written by Shakespeare in the early 1600's. There have been many papers and many different thoughts about the play. This paper, though, is over who is the stronger character, Macbeth or Lady Macbeth? Macbeth is the weaker character of the play. The play is about a nobleman of the King of Scotland, Macbeth, who is told by witches that he could possibly become king if he did a terrible deed. They also showed his right hand man, Banquo, a prediction as well. That his bloodline will lead to kings. The deed that Macbeth has to commit is to kill the king and take his place. Macbeth tells his wife, Lady Macbeth, about the prediction the witches and she continues to encourage him until he does kill the king and scared off the king's sons so he can become king himself. He becomes king and the witches that showed him being king came around again and showed Macbeth another prediction. The prediction showed that Banquo's family will become king and will lead to more kings. Macbeth decides to kill Banquo and his son but his son gets away. One of the sons of the now dead king returns with an army and attacks Macbeth at his own castle. Macduff, one of the many people affected by Macbeth's rise to power, engaged Macbeth during the attack and beheaded Macbeth in the end. After the battle, Malcolm, one of the sons of the slain king, took power of Scotland and the play ends. Macbeth, at the very beginning of the play, demonstrated just how weak of a character he is. He lets the three witches who meet him at the start of the play continue to speak there poisonous, twisted words "Stay, you imperfect speakers, tell me more..."(1.3, 70-71). He lets their words fester in the back of his mind until he goes mad with greed. He also shows his weakness by listening and believing the words of the witches, which he knows are not to be trusted "Your children shall be king..."(1.3, 86-88). He tells his wife about the witches predictions, who then continues to press upon him the need to fulfill his, at that time, "destiny". Macbeth finally succumbs to the nags of his wife "Prithee, peace! I dare do all..." (1.7, 45-47). Throughout the continuation of the play, Macbeth continues to show his weakness and lack of a spine.

Perspectives on the 1939 White Paper During World War II

In 1939, the British government published a White Paper severely restricting Jewish immigration and planning for an independent Palestinian state within ten years. On the part of the British, this was an effort to secure crucial Arab cooperation in case of war. But neither the Jews nor the Arabs were pleased with the White Paper. The Jews took direct action against it, arguing that it violated earlier promises that had been made to them. The Arabs, on the other hand, argued that the restrictions were too weak.Still, the Arabs recognized the White Paper as a move in the right direction and although they went on record as opposed to it, they did not openly fight it. While the Jews forcefully rejected the White Paper, most of the Zionist leadership postponed the fight against the British in order to support them in the war. Some Jewish terrorist organizations, however, did spring up to target Britain. Throughout World War II, the White Paper allowed the British the support they had been seeking from the Arabs, while drawing opposition from the Jews.In the period leading up to the issue of the White Paper, Britain’s attempts to resolve the crisis in Palestine â€Å"occurred against a backdrop of developing tensions in Europe and the Mediterranean that ultimately had a major impact on Britain’s Palestine policy† (Smith 139). To the British, the Arab Revolt that had taken place from 1936 to 1939 â€Å"signified a rebellion that had to be crushed, not simply to preserve Britain’s own position in Palestine as the mandatory power, but to consolidate that position by appealing for Arab support both within and outside Palestine once the revolt had ended† (Smith 139).This position was adopted as the threat of war began to loom closer. German and Italian propaganda was aimed toward the Arabs, encouraging them to revolt against the British. The British knew that they could not afford to send large numbers of troops to quash a rebellion when their forces would be necessary in Europe. They also recognized the strategic importance of Palestine, and British military planners â€Å"now began to view Palestine in light of envisaged wartime needs† (Smith 139).Any troops currently in Palestine would have to be transferred to Egypt and the Suez Canal at the outbreak of war, and eventually reinforcements from India would have to travel through Palestine. Peace in Palestine was now considered â€Å"essential to British military security† (Smith 139). But more was necessary to guarantee British security in the region. In addition to control over Palestine, the British needed â€Å"assurance of the tacit, if not open, support of the neighboring Arab countries† (Smith 140).The Palestine situation was crucial to gaining this support, as Arab leaders had become increasingly involved in the conflict during the revolt. Creating a solution that was favorable to the Arabs would promise Britain the support of the Arab world during the war. In January 1939, British strategists advised that â€Å"‘immediately on the outbreak of war, the necessary measures would be taken†¦in order to bring about a complete appeasement of Arab opinion in Palestine and in neighboring countries’† (Smith 140) The British also recognized that maintaining their mandatory power in Palestine was necessary if they hoped to use it as a strategic base.But the Partition Plan had already been proposed by the Peel Commission in 1937. This â€Å"raised questions in the Foreign Office: if the Jews were recognized as having national status in part of Palestine, what further justification would there be for Britain’s staying there as mandatory authority? † (Smith 140). Nevertheless, the Cabinet approved the Partition Plan. Expecting the Zionists to do the same, they were â€Å"startled by the force of Zionist opposition to the plan† (Smith 140). As a result, the Woodhead Commission was f ormed to investigate the possibilities for partition.The Foreign Office, which strongly opposed partition, used this opportunity to have the committee â€Å"reopen the question of the practicability of partition, not just its scope† (Smith 140). Fearing a hostile Arab reaction to British policy, the Foreign Office argued that â€Å"‘the European implications of a hostile Middle East aligned with Britain’s enemies must override the arguments in favour of partition’† (Smith 140). The Woodhead commission submitted its report in November 1938, after a period of severe Arab revolt had â€Å"temporarily paralyzed much of Palestine† (Smith 141).The Commission concluded that â€Å"there were no feasible boundaries for ‘self-supporting Arab and Jewish states’† (Smith 141). Still, the commissioners recommended three different partition plans. One plan reduced the Jewish portion to approximately 400 square miles along the coast, whil e the other two made the state even smaller. The Zionists rejected all of the proposals, which paved the way for the British government to issue a White Paper on November 9, 1938, which â€Å"discarded the entire notion of partition as ‘impracticable’† (Smith 141).This abandonment of partition allowed the British to take control of all of Palestine, securing their mandatory power and their strategic bases. Although they had succeeded in maintaining control, the British still needed to resolve the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews. The White Paper therefore called for a conference in which the two group would discuss â€Å"‘future policy, including the question of immigration into Palestine’† (Smith 141). It also warned that if the two parties could not agree, the British would â€Å"‘take their own decision in the light of their examination of the problem’† (Smith 141).The St. James Conference, held in London in Febru ary 1939, swiftly reached an impasse. Jamal al-Husayni, the cousin of the mufti, â€Å"demanded the creation of an independent Arab state and the dismantling of the Jewish National Home,† while Chaim Weizmann argued for â€Å"a continuation of the mandate and British sponsorship of unlimited immigration† (Smith 141). With the threat of war looming ever closer, â€Å"Arab opinion in the Middle East now seemed more important to British interests than was Jewish opinion in Palestine or Jewish political influence in London† (Smith 143).The British government decided to act. They â€Å"finally agreed to the Arab state overtures† (Smith 142) and published the White Paper on May 17, 1939. The 1939 White Paper illustrated a â€Å"stunning reversal of policy† (Smith 139) and was â€Å"interpreted by contemporaries as marking the end of the alliance between the Jews and Great Britain† (Shapira 276). It restricted Jewish immigration into Palestine to 1 0,000 per year for five years with an additional 25,000 refugees permitted.After five years, no further Jewish immigration would be allowed â€Å"‘unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it’† (Shapira 469). Land transfers to Jews were also restricted to certain areas. The White Paper declared that â€Å"‘His Majesty’s Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish state against the will of the Arab population of the country’† (Smith 142). The new policy planned for Palestine to be an independent Arab state within ten ears, when Jews would make up no more than one-third of the population. Zionist reaction to the 1939 White Paper was abrupt. Declaring that the Jews would resist its implementation, the Jewish Agency argued that the plan was â€Å"contrary to international law and a violation of the promises made to the Jews in and since the Balfour Declaration† (Smith 142). On the day after its publication, the Grand Rabbi tore up a copy of the White Paper before the assembled congregation in the principal synagogue of Jerusalem.Street demonstrations in the same city resulted in the death of a British constable from a Jewish revolver shot. Mass meetings of Jews throughout the country took an oath to observe a proclamation which contained the following passages: ‘Whereas the British Government has announced a new policy in Palestine†¦Now therefore the Jewish population proclaims before the world that this treacherous policy will not be tolerated. The Jewish population will fight it to the uttermost, and will spare no sacrifice to frustrate and defeat it’ (Khalidi 473).Jews in Palestine also announced policies of civil disobedience and non-cooperation with the British, but these plans soon ceased as â€Å"Jewish leaders knew that if the Government were t o cease its active support of the National Home the latter’s entire structure would be imperiled† (Khalidi 473). In general, â€Å"the Zionist leadership abandoned the fight against Britain and dedicated itself to promoting maximum participation of the Jewish community in the war effort† (Shapira 280). The Jewish community argued over whether they should fight the White Paper or support the British in the hope that their post-war policy would change.Moderates felt that the White Paper had been issued only because the war required Arab support. Arthur Ruppin wrote in his diary in May 1939 that â€Å"‘This White Paper emanates from a certain political constellation (Arab united front, Britain’s fear of the Arabs) and will be equally short-lived’† (Shapira 290). Moderates â€Å"demanded that tension with the British be reduced; Jews should be unconditionally loyal until the end of the war, assuming that the British government would ultima tely change its policy† (Shapira 290).Even Vladimir Jabotinsky, â€Å"despite all this criticism of the mandate government and all his attempts to exert pressure on it by threatening to replace it with another power, was not prepared to give Britain a bill of divorce. Until his dying day, he supported a pro-British orientation† (Shapira 246). Immigration, though, remained a strong point of contention. Before the publication of the White Paper, Zionist leaders had decided to increase illegal immigration of Jews into Palestine. Of the 27,561 Jews who arrived in Palestine in 1939, 11,156 were unauthorized (Smith 165).With the beginning of war, these plans intensified as thousands of refugees attempted to flee Europe. David Ben-Gurion warned that while Jews would â€Å"‘help the British in their struggle as if there were no White Paper’† they would also â€Å"‘resist the White Paper as if there were no war’† (Shapira 279). This situat ion â€Å"brought Zionists and British officials into immediate conflict† (Smith 165). When the British decided to hold illegal immigrants in internment camps in Palestine, the Zionists reacted by flooding the country with immigrants in order to make the policy impossible.The British then decided that refugees who reached Palestine would be transferred to the island of Mauritius. They simultaneously struggled to stop the flow of refugees from Europe by urging countries like Turkey to deny them transit. After the outbreak of war, the impossible refugee situation â€Å"created ‘almost†¦a war within a war’† as â€Å"Jews became increasingly bitter at what they saw as British inhumanity† (Smith 165). This situation led to disaster. In November 1940, British naval patrols intercepted two ships and transferred over 1,700 refugees to the SS Patria to be deported to Mauritius.While the ship was ported in Haifa, the Jewish defense force Hagana â€Å"ar ranged for a bomb to be placed near the hull to disable the ship, thereby forcing British authorities to permit the Jews to stay. The plan miscarried, and the ship sank with over 200 casualties† (Smith 165). The Zionists were outraged. Faced with propaganda that accused them of responsibility for the deaths, the British cabinet allowed the survivors of the Patria to remain in Palestine.Another disaster occurred in February 1942 when the British convinced the Turks to forbid the SS Struma passage into the Mediterranean. The ship full of Romanian Jews was turned back and sank with only one survivor. To the Zionists, â€Å"this was proof of British perfidy† (Smith 165). While most Jewish leaders recognized that they could not declare war on Britain, Jewish terrorist groups did grow and aim their attacks at the British. The Jewish broadcasting station, Kol Israel, stated that â€Å"The paralysing of the railways all over the country through utting the lines in 242 places s erves as a warning to the Government of the White Paper† (Khalidi 606). Such activists saw the White Paper â€Å"as the result of a British assessment that the Jews had no choice but to resign themselves to an anti-Zionist policy, because they needed British protection against the Arabs† (Shapira 290). They set out to prove the British wrong. They argued that â€Å"the only way to bring about a change in British policy was by ample demonstration of Jewish power and willingness to fight and suffer losses† (Shapira 290).They also hoped to show the British government that enforcing the new restrictions â€Å"would make it necessary for them to carry out acts of suppression on a large scale, and it was doubtful whether the British government would approve† (Shapira 290). Their actions were designed to send the British â€Å"a clear message about what the absolute limits were, limits beyond which they were prepared to die and even to kill† (Shapira 290). The publication of the 1939 White Paper also led the Irgun, a Revisionist terrorist group, to shift its focus from the Arabs to the British.Irgun began attacking British administrative buildings, assaulting British police personnel, and bombing gathering places. But once the war began, Jabotinsky urged his followers in the Revisionist party â€Å"to support the British effort against the Nazis† (Smith 170). Most of the Irgun followed Jabotinsky’s orders. Those who did not were led by Abraham Stern. The Stern Gang, formed in 1940, was â€Å"willing to rob Jewish concerns, such as a Histadrut bank, with Jewish loss of life as well as assault British officials† (Smith 170).Stern simultaneously established relationships with German and Italian representatives, offering them â€Å"his service to their cause for the duration of the war† (Smith 170). Ignoring the Nazis’ anti-Semitic platform, Stern allied himself with the Germans simply because they were fighting Britain. The Hagana and the Irgun both condemned the Stern Gang, offering the British police information that led to Stern’s murder in a February 1942 raid. For the next two years, there was little Zionist underground activity.The leaders of the Stern Gang were either dead or in prison, and the Irgun had lost its leadership with Jabotinsky’s death. But Menachem Begin, who arrived in Palestine in 1942, â€Å"saw himself as the heir to Jabotinsky’s Revisionist ideals† (Smith 170). At the end of 1943, both Irgun and the Stern Gang â€Å"were again preparing for anti-British action, inspired by both the receding German threat in the Middle East and the ongoing tensions in Zionist-British relations, exacerbated particularly by the legacy of the refugee ships and the growing awareness of the Holocaust† (Smith 170).This situation led to cooperation between Begin and the remaining members of the Stern Gang. Under the name LEHI, they resumed their actions against Britain. The actions of LEHI resulted in the opposite of their intended effects. In July 1943, Winston Churchill instigated the creation of a cabinet committee on Palestine that would examine alternatives to the 1939 White Paper. The committee recommended partition, but the plan was never officially approved because on November 6, members of LEHI assassinated Lord Moyne, the deputy minister of state for Middle East Affairs in Cairo.Since Moyne had been a close friend of Churchill, the Prime Minister â€Å"reacted by shelving the partition scheme he had seen through, against stiff opposition from his ministers† (Smith 170). He announced to the House of Commons that â€Å"‘if our dreams for Zionism are to end in the smoke of assassins’ pistols and our labours for its future to produce only a new set of gangsters worthy of Nazi Germany, many like myself will have to reconsider the position we have maintained so consistently in the past’† (Smith 170).Partition was not discussed again during Churchill’s term. For the duration of the war, Churchill’s warning to the Jews worked: â€Å"they stopped underground activities that seemed to threaten the likelihood of any cooperation with a British government after the war† (Smith 170). Arab views on the White Paper also varied, as â€Å"The Arab community in Palestine was essentially leaderless, riven with more factions than ever before† (Smith 144). Although they recognized this as a step in the right direction, â€Å"The Arab reaction was only partially favourable† (Khalidi 470).They were pleased with the â€Å"definite statement that there was no intention of setting up a Jewish state and the apparent determination to make Palestine an independent country in which the Jews formed not more than a third of the total population† (Khalidi 470). But they still viewed the restrictions concerning land sales as â€Å"quite inadequateâ €  because â€Å"they ignored the fact that the rights and position of the Arab population were also being prejudiced by land purchases made by Jews avowedly for ‘political and strategical reasons’ – i. . , with a view to dominating the whole country† (Khalidi 470). Arabs also had trouble believing that the British would enforce these new immigration plans. From their point of view, â€Å"similar statements at intervals during the last twenty years had never yet been followed by a cessation of the illegal immigration, and the Arab delegates saw no reason to suppose that they would be on this occasion either† (Khalidi 470).Precautionary statements in the White Paper such as â€Å"‘should public opinion in Palestine hereafter show itself in favour of such a development’ and ‘provided that local conditions permit,’ taken together with ‘adequate provision for the special position in Palestine of the Jewish National Ho me’† suggested to the Arabs that â€Å"Jewish opposition would still be allowed to block constitutional development indefinitely† (Khalidi 471). Moderate Arabs and the leaders of the Arab governments saw the White Paper as hopeful.Those who encouraged defiance optimistically â€Å"used the example of the Arab Revolt and its presumed success in forcing Britain to deal with the Arabs, whatever its military failure† (Smith 144). The Arab Higher Committee, on the other hand, â€Å"repudiated the White Paper because it did not promise them immediate independence with a halt to Jewish immigration† (Smith 142), maintaining its â€Å"consistent refusal to admit that any part of Palestine should be given to the Zionists† (Smith 144). As a result of their rejection of the White Paper, â€Å"A certain limited recrudescence of Arab violence even manifested itself in Palestine† (Khalidi 471).The mufti, who had been officially banned from Palestine after his escape in October 1937, had a similar reaction. After the outbreak of war, British officials in Palestine sought the mufti’s support for the White Paper and his help in implementing it. They did so â€Å"out of fear of his ability to arouse general Arab hostility toward the British position in the Middle East at that time† (Smith 171). The mufti â€Å"rejected these requests and the White Paper itself† and instead â€Å"aligned himself with the Iraqi rebellion against Great Britain in April 1941, and once it failed†¦he spent the rest of the war supporting the German war effort† (Smith 171).In general, though, Arab reaction to the 1939 White Paper was not hostile. Agreeing not to engage in overt political activity, â€Å"members of the Higher Committee accepted British offers of safe return to Palestine† (Smith 172). Other leaders including â€Å"a number of leading members of the Istaqlal and the Palestine Arab party that represente d the Husaynis, along with Husayn al-Khalidi of the Reform party, reestablished themselves in the country. In general they indicated their reserved acceptance of the 1939 White Paper and istanced themselves from the mufti† (Smith 172). Although fierce Axis propaganda (including the mufti urging rebellion) was focused on Palestine in 1941 and 1942, the Arabs in Palestine remained calm. Another revolt was recognized as â€Å"out of the question, both for political and military reasons. It appeared that the British were coming closer to the Arab point of view. Although they were still quite far from meeting the Arab demands, the process was proceeding in a positive direction from the Arab perspective† (Shapira 282).In addition, the Arabs realized that any uprising would have been immediately put down by British forces stationed in Palestine. In general, â€Å"the Arab community in Palestine remained a passive element in the occurrences both during the war and afterward. T he years 1939-1947 were apparently the longest continuous period of quiet and relative tranquility in Arab-Jewish relations in Palestine since the 1920s† (Shapira 282). The reaction of Palestinian Arabs was one of â€Å"general political quiescence† (Kimmerling 134). To many, the White Paper indicated that the British intended to grant Arab independence in Palestine.Arabs saw the Zionist struggle against the policy as â€Å"a sign of anxiety and weakness† (Kimmerling 134). They were certain that â€Å"All they needed to do was bide their time† (Kimmerling 134). The British government’s strategic decision to publish the 1939 White Paper therefore proved fruitful. Although the Arabs were not entirely pleased with the decision and argued for stronger restrictions, they did offer the British their support during the war. The Jews, on the other hand, were divided in their reaction to the White Paper.Some violently fought the restrictions while others rec ognized the importance of siding with Britain. The British recognized that the consequences of Jewish terrorism were far outweighed by the support they needed from the Arab world, and throughout World War II the 1939 White Paper succeeded in that respect. Both Arabs and Jews rejected the White Paper, although to differing degrees. The Arabs argued that the restrictions were too weak, but they still offered Britain their support. The Jews struggled to fight the policy while still backing the British war effort.The British entered World War II â€Å"aware that their Palestine policy reversal in the 1939 White Paper had outraged the Zionists without satisfying the Arabs. They accepted this as the price for temporarily stabilizing their military and strategic positions in Palestine and the Arab world at large†¦It was a short-term strategy of expediency and calculated appeasement designed to serve Britain’s immediate wartime and possibly long-range imperial designs that assu med a British presence in Palestine for the foreseeable future† (Smith 145).Summary of each†¦ Info about reexamination of Husayn-McMahon Correspondence? See also Khalidi p. 468 for this. The Zionist (Biltmore) Program held in in May 1942 declared that â€Å"The Conference calls for the fulfillment of the original purpose of the Balfour Declaration which†¦was to afford them [Jews] the opportunity, as stated by President Wilson, to found there a Jewish Commonwealth.The Conference affirms its unalterable rejection of the White Paper of May 1939 and denies its moral or legal validity†¦The policy of the White Paper is cruel and indefensible in its denial of sanctuary to Jews fleeing from Nazi persecution; and at a time when Palestine has become a focal point in the war front of the United Nations, and Palestine Jewry must provide all available manpower for farm and factory and camp, it is in direct conflict with the interests of the allied war effort† (Khalid i 497).They wanted Palestine to be an Arab state and they felt that the McMahon-Hussein correspondence had promised them that. They hoped to limit the number of Jews in Palestine to only those who were already there. The Jews argued that the White Paper violated promises made to them in the Balfour Declaration. Multiple standpoints existed within the Jewish community, from more moderate views to Jabotinsky and the Revisionist Party’s radical opinions.

Meaning of Working Capital Essay

Working capital refers to the part of total capital which is required for day to day working of the business. The funds are required by the business for conducting its regular operations such as purchase of raw materials of finished goods, payment of wages & manufacturing expenses, office and administrative expenses, selling & distribution expenses. The funds necessary for making such regular payments of business is called Working Capital therefore have been defined as â€Å"the amount of funds necessary to cover cost of operating the enterprise.† The working capital of a business enterprise is measured on the basis of its funds locked up in various current assets such as inventors, accounts receivables and cash & bank balance. 2.2 Definition of Working Capital– Various authorities have difined working capital in following manner. (1)â€Å"Working Capital is the amount of funds necessary to cover the cost of operating the buisness enterprise.â€Å"(Shuibn) (2)â€Å"Working Capital is the difference between the book value of the current assets.and the current liablities.â€Å"(Hoagland) 2.3 Circulating Capital– â€Å"Circulating capital means current assets of accompany that are changed in the ordinary course of business from into another, as for example from cash to inventories, inventories to receivables and receivables into cash.† Cash Raw Receivables Materials Finished goods Work-in-progress 2.4. Classification of Working Capital – 1. Gross Working Capital5. Variable Working Capital 2. Net Working Capital 6. Balance Sheet Working Capital 3. Negative Working Capital 7. Cash Working Capital 4. Permanent Working Capital 2.5. Sources of Working Capital- The following are the some important of the sources of working capital.